Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

6
Reports
6
Properties concerned
5
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date Start: 2002close
Date end:2002close
Threats* : Commercial developmentclose Housingclose Industrial areasclose Interpretative and visitation facilitiesclose Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructureclose
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/18
Threats*: Housing Industrial areas
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2
Threats*: Commercial development Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Housing
Other Threats: Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Industrial areas
States Parties: Democratic Republic of the Congo
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/18
Threats*: Housing
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Mexico
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top