State of Conservation
13
Reports
13
Properties concerned
11
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2009close
Date end:2009close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
aflaj irrigation systems of omanAflaj Irrigation Systems of Oman | oman |
2009 | Legal framework, | No |
ancient ksour of ouadane, chinguetti, tichitt and oualataAncient Ksour of Ouadane, Chinguetti, Tichitt and Oualata | mauritania |
2009 | Legal framework, | No |
archaeological site of panamá viejo and historic district of panamáArchaeological Site of Panamá Viejo and Historic District of Panamá | panama |
2009 | Legal framework,
Other Threats: Severe deterioration of historic buildings that threatens the Outstanding universal value of the property |
No |
borobudur temple compoundsBorobudur Temple Compounds | indonesia |
2009 | Legal framework, | No |
coiba national park and its special zone of marine protectionCoiba National Park and its Special Zone of Marine Protection | panama |
2009 | Legal framework, | No |
colonial city of santo domingoColonial City of Santo Domingo | dominican republic |
2009 | Legal framework, | No |
historic centre of rigaHistoric Centre of Riga | latvia |
2009 | Legal framework, | No |
lake baikalLake Baikal | russian federation |
2009 | Legal framework, | No |
medieval monuments in kosovoMedieval Monuments in Kosovo | serbia |
2009 | Legal framework,
Other Threats: e) Unsatisfactory state of conservation and maintenance of the property |
Yes |
natural and culturo-historical region of kotorNatural and Culturo-Historical Region of Kotor | montenegro |
2009 | Legal framework, | No |
rock-hewn churches, lalibelaRock-Hewn Churches, Lalibela | ethiopia |
2009 | Legal framework,
Other Threats: Geological and architectural characteristics of the churches. |
No |
vilnius historic centreVilnius Historic Centre | lithuania |
2009 | Legal framework, | No |
western caucasusWestern Caucasus | russian federation |
2009 | Legal framework, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.