State of Conservation
8
Reports
8
Properties concerned
25
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date Start:
2019close
Date end:2019close
| Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ancient and primeval beech forests of the carpathians and other regions of europeAncient and Primeval Beech Forests of the Carpathians and Other Regions of Europe | albania,austria,belgium,bosnia and herzegovina,bulgaria,croatia,czechia,france,germany,italy,north macedonia,poland,romania,slovakia,slovenia,spain,switzerland,ukraine Albania Austria Bosnia and Herzegovina Belgium Bulgaria Switzerland Czechia Germany Spain France Croatia Italy North Macedonia Poland Romania Slovenia Slovakia Ukraine |
2019 | Legal framework, | No |
| cerrado protected areas: chapada dos veadeiros and emas national parksCerrado Protected Areas: Chapada dos Veadeiros and Emas National Parks | brazil Brazil |
2019 | Legal framework, | No |
| coiba national park and its special zone of marine protectionCoiba National Park and its Special Zone of Marine Protection | panama Panama |
2019 | Legal framework, | No |
| east rennellEast Rennell | solomon islands Solomon Islands |
2019 | Legal framework, | Yes |
| rio plátano biosphere reserveRío Plátano Biosphere Reserve | honduras Honduras |
2019 | Legal framework, | Yes |
| selous game reserveSelous Game Reserve | united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania |
2019 | Legal framework,
Other Threats: Significant decline of wildlife populations due to poaching ; Need for increased involvement of local communities |
Yes |
| socotra archipelagoSocotra Archipelago | yemen Yemen |
2019 | Legal framework, | No |
| western caucasusWestern Caucasus | russian federation Russian Federation |
2019 | Legal framework, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
