State of Conservation
12
Reports
12
Properties concerned
11
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
1996close
Date end:1996close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
air and tenere natural reservesAir and Ténéré Natural Reserves | niger Niger | 1996 | Illegal activities, | Yes |
arabian oryx sanctuaryArabian Oryx Sanctuary | oman Oman | 1996 | Illegal activities, | No |
archaeological sites of bat, al-khutm and al-aynArchaeological Sites of Bat, Al-Khutm and Al-Ayn | oman Oman | 1996 | Illegal activities,
Other Threats: Several repairs or preventive measures needed |
No |
garamba national parkGaramba National Park | democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo | 1996 | Illegal activities, | No |
komodo national parkKomodo National Park | indonesia Indonesia | 1996 | Illegal activities, | No |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india India | 1996 | Illegal activities,
Other Threats: Destruction of Park infrastructures |
Yes |
mount nimba strict nature reserveMount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve | cote d'ivoire,guinea Côte d'Ivoire Guinea |
1996 | Illegal activities, | Yes |
plitvice lakes national parkPlitvice Lakes National Park | croatia Croatia | 1996 | Illegal activities,
Other Threats: Neglected Park infrastructure |
Yes |
rio plátano biosphere reserveRío Plátano Biosphere Reserve | honduras Honduras | 1996 | Illegal activities, | No |
ruins of kilwa kisiwani and ruins of songo mnaraRuins of Kilwa Kisiwani and Ruins of Songo Mnara | united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania | 1996 | Illegal activities,
Other Threats: General poor state of conservation |
No |
sangay national parkSangay National Park | ecuador Ecuador | 1996 | Illegal activities, | Yes |
virunga national parkVirunga National Park | democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo | 1996 | Illegal activities, | Yes |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.