Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

9
Reports
9
Properties concerned
8
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start: 2013close
Date end:2013close
Threats* : Illegal activitiesclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
ancient city of nessebarAncient City of Nessebar bulgaria Bulgaria 2013 Illegal activities, No
chan chan archaeological zoneChan Chan Archaeological Zone peru Peru 2013 Illegal activities,
Other Threats: Continuous deterioration of earthen architecture structures and decorated surfaces from lack of conservation and maintenance practices
Yes
cultural landscape and archaeological remains of the bamiyan valleyCultural Landscape and Archaeological Remains of the Bamiyan Valley afghanistan Afghanistan 2013 Illegal activities,
Other Threats: Risk of imminent collapse of the Giant Buddha niches; Irreversible deterioration of the mural paintings; Anti-personnel mines and unexploded ordinances (i.e. munitions)
Yes
historic centres of berat and gjirokastraHistoric Centres of Berat and Gjirokastra albania Albania 2013 Illegal activities,
Other Threats: Fire
No
minaret and archaeological remains of jamMinaret and Archaeological Remains of Jam afghanistan Afghanistan 2013 Illegal activities,
Other Threats: Inclination of the Minaret
Yes
old town of galle and its fortificationsOld Town of Galle and its Fortifications sri lanka Sri Lanka 2013 Illegal activities, No
ruins of kilwa kisiwani and ruins of songo mnaraRuins of Kilwa Kisiwani and Ruins of Songo Mnara united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania 2013 Illegal activities,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the architectural heritage fabric
Yes
tipasaTipasa algeria Algeria 2013 Illegal activities, No
tyreTyre lebanon Lebanon 2013 Illegal activities,
Other Threats: Insufficient maintenance
No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top