Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

474
Reports
98
Properties concerned
56
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2009close
Threats* : Illegal activitiesclose
States Parties: Australia
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Illegal activities
States Parties: Mauritania
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Illegal activities
States Parties: Mauritania
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Illegal activities
States Parties: Mauritania
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Illegal activities
States Parties: Mauritania
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Illegal activities
States Parties: Belarus Poland
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Illegal activities
Other Threats: a) Alterations of the hydrological regime; b) Border fence impeding mammal movements
States Parties: Belarus Poland
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Illegal activities
Other Threats: a) Alterations of the hydrological regime; b) Border fence impeding mammal movements
States Parties: Belarus Poland
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Illegal activities
Other Threats: a) Alterations of the hydrological regime; b) Border fence impeding mammal movements
States Parties: Belarus Poland
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Illegal activities
Other Threats: a) Alterations of the hydrological regime; b) Border fence impeding mammal movement
States Parties: Belarus Poland
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Illegal activities
Other Threats: a) Effect on forest biomes through drainage of agricultural land on the Belarus side and a reservoir on the Polish side; b) Presence of an artificial fence along the international boundary impeding large mammal movement.
States Parties: Albania
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Illegal activities
Other Threats: Slow progress on the implementation of the recommendations of the joint missions
States Parties: Albania
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Illegal activities
Other Threats: a) lack of adequate protection management, and conservation of the site b) Poor state of conservation of the propert
States Parties: Albania
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Illegal activities
Other Threats: a) Lack of adequate protection and conservation of the site b) Poor state of conservation of the property
States Parties: Albania
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Illegal activities
Other Threats: a) Lack of adequate protection and conservation of the site; b) Poor state of conservation of the property ; c) Insufficient implementation of the recommendations of the joint missions
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Albania
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev
Threats*: Illegal activities
Other Threats: a) Lack of adequate protection and conservation of the site; b) Serious deterioration of materials resulting in an important loss of cultural significance
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Uganda
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Illegal activities
States Parties: Uganda
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Illegal activities
States Parties: Uganda
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14
Threats*: Illegal activities
States Parties: Uganda
Year: 1995
Document Source: WHC-95/CONF.201/4
Threats*: Illegal activities
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7A
Threats*: Illegal activities
Other Threats: Continuous deterioration of earthen architecture structures and decorated surfaces from lack of conservation and maintenance practices
Danger List:  Yes

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top