State of Conservation
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.001/3,WHC-93/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | CLT-92/CONF.003/3,WHC-92/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1985 |
Document Source: | SC-85/CONF.008/9 |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1984 |
Document Source: | SC/84/CONF.004/9 |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7A,WHC/17/41.COM/INF.7 Rev |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Mercury contamination of fish and wildlife |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Mercury contamination of fish and wildlife |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Mercury contamination of fish and wildlife |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Mercury contamination of fish and wildlife |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | Summary of the implementation of the corrective measures, prepared by the Secretariat / Résumé de la mise en oeuvre des mesures correctives, préparé par le Secrétariat (en anglais),WHC-13/37.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Mercury contamination of fish and wildlife |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Mercury contamination of fish and wildlife |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Mercury contamination of fish and wildlife |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Concerns about numbers of boaters in Florida Bay and their impacts on bottomland wilderness, including especially propeller scars from boat groundings. |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/18 |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4 |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties
Algeria Argentina Australia Austria Bangladesh Benin Brazil Bulgaria Burkina Faso Cameroon Canada China Colombia Costa Rica Cuba Ethiopia Greece Honduras India Iraq Italy Japan Kenya Malaysia Montenegro Morocco New Zealand Niger Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Portugal Russian Federation Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Slovenia Spain Thailand Tunisia United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Zambia ZimbabweThreats
Water infrastructure 262
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.