State of Conservation
267
Reports
36
Properties concerned
31
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date end:2021close
States Parties: | Canada |
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Lack of engagement with First Nations and Metis in monitoring activities and insufficient consideration of traditional ecological knowledge |
States Parties: | Canada |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Lack of engagement with First Nations and Metis in monitoring activities and insufficient consideration of traditional ecological knowledge |
States Parties: | Canada |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: | Canada |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | CLT-92/CONF.003/3,WHC-92/CONF.002/12 |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Bison herd infected with either tuberculosis and/or brucellosis |
States Parties: | Canada |
Year: | 1991 |
Document Source: | SC-91/CONF.002/4 Add. |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Bison herd infected with either tuberculosis and/or brucellosis |
States Parties: | Canada |
Year: | 1990 |
Document Source: | CC-90/CONF.004/13 |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Bison herd infected with either tuberculosis and/or brucellosis |
States Parties: | Canada |
Year: | 1985 |
Document Source: | SC-85/CONF.008/9 |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties
Argentina Australia Bangladesh Benin Brazil Bulgaria Burkina Faso Cameroon Canada China Colombia Costa Rica Honduras India Japan Kenya Malaysia Montenegro New Zealand Niger Panama Russian Federation Senegal Slovenia Spain Thailand Tunisia United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Zambia ZimbabweThreats
Water infrastructure 267
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.