Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

20
Reports
1
Properties concerned
1
States Parties with SOC reports
Property: Historical Monuments of Mtskhetaclose
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2023
Document Source: WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add.2
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition Land conversion Management activities Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2021
Initialy proposed for examination in 2020
Document Source: WHC/21/44.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition Land conversion Management activities Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2018
Document Source: WHC/18/42.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition Land conversion Management activities Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2017
Document Source: WHC/17/41.COM/7B
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition Land conversion Management activities Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7A
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition Land conversion Management activities Management systems/ management plan
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2015
Document Source: WHC-15/39.COM/7A
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition Housing Land conversion Management activities Management systems/ management plan
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2014
Document Source: WHC-14/38.COM/7A
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition Land conversion Management activities
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2013
Document Source: WHC-13/37.COM/7A
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition Land conversion Localised utilities Management activities
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition Land conversion Management activities Management systems/ management plan
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7A
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition Land conversion Management activities Management systems/ management plan
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition Land conversion Management activities Management systems/ management plan
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition Land conversion Management activities Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: f) Loss of authenticity
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management activities Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Loss of authenticity in recent works carried out by the Church
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Management activities Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Housing Management activities
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Housing Management activities
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Housing Management activities
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.209/14
Threats*: Financial resources High impact research / monitoring activities Housing Management activities Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Critical conditions of particularly two archaeological sites

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top