State of Conservation
7
Reports
1
Properties concerned
1
States Parties with SOC reports
Property:
Lines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Palpaclose
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Air transport infrastructure Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Housing Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals Management systems/ management plan Mining |
Other Threats: | Lack of systematic monitoring of the site |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Illegal activities Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals Mining |
Other Threats: | Lack of systematic monitoring of the site |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Crop production Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Illegal activities Mining |
Other Threats: | Lack of systematic monitoring of the site |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Crop production Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Illegal activities Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals Mining |
Other Threats: | Lack of systematic monitoring of the site |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Crop production Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Illegal activities Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals Management systems/ management plan Mining |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5 |
States Parties
Peru
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.