State of Conservation
9
Reports
1
Properties concerned
1
States Parties with SOC reports
Property:
Kizhi Pogostclose
Date end:2010close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
kizhi pogostKizhi Pogost | russian federation Russian Federation | 2010 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: a) Structural integrity of the Church of the Transfiguration |
No |
kizhi pogostKizhi Pogost | russian federation Russian Federation | 2009 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Structural integrity of the Church of the Transfiguration |
No |
kizhi pogostKizhi Pogost | russian federation Russian Federation | 2008 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Structural integrity of the Church of the Transfiguration |
No |
kizhi pogostKizhi Pogost | russian federation Russian Federation | 2007 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Structural integrity of the Church of the Transfiguration |
No |
kizhi pogostKizhi Pogost | russian federation Russian Federation | 2006 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Structural integrity of the Church of the Transfiguration |
No |
kizhi pogostKizhi Pogost | russian federation Russian Federation | 2003 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the structures |
No |
kizhi pogostKizhi Pogost | russian federation Russian Federation | 1994 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Lack of fire /lightning protection; Deformation and deterioration of the structures |
No |
kizhi pogostKizhi Pogost | russian federation Russian Federation | 1993 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Lack of fire /lightning protection; Deformation and deterioration of the structures |
No |
kizhi pogostKizhi Pogost | russian federation Russian Federation | 1992 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Lack of fire /lightning protection; Deformation and deterioration of the structures |
No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.