Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

9
Reports
1
Properties concerned
1
States Parties with SOC reports
Property: Kizhi Pogostclose
Date end:2010close
Threats* : Management systems/ management planclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
kizhi pogostKizhi Pogost russian federation Russian Federation 2010 Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: a) Structural integrity of the Church of the Transfiguration
No
kizhi pogostKizhi Pogost russian federation Russian Federation 2009 Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Structural integrity of the Church of the Transfiguration
No
kizhi pogostKizhi Pogost russian federation Russian Federation 2008 Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Structural integrity of the Church of the Transfiguration
No
kizhi pogostKizhi Pogost russian federation Russian Federation 2007 Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Structural integrity of the Church of the Transfiguration
No
kizhi pogostKizhi Pogost russian federation Russian Federation 2006 Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Structural integrity of the Church of the Transfiguration
No
kizhi pogostKizhi Pogost russian federation Russian Federation 2003 Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the structures
No
kizhi pogostKizhi Pogost russian federation Russian Federation 1994 Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Lack of fire /lightning protection; Deformation and deterioration of the structures
No
kizhi pogostKizhi Pogost russian federation Russian Federation 1993 Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Lack of fire /lightning protection; Deformation and deterioration of the structures
No
kizhi pogostKizhi Pogost russian federation Russian Federation 1992 Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Lack of fire /lightning protection; Deformation and deterioration of the structures
No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top