State of Conservation
5
Reports
1
Properties concerned
1
States Parties with SOC reports
Property:
Fortifications on the Caribbean Side of Panama: Portobelo-San Lorenzoclose
Date end:2004close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
fortifications on the caribbean side of panama: portobelo-san lorenzoFortifications on the Caribbean Side of Panama: Portobelo-San Lorenzo | panama Panama | 2004 | Avalanche/ landslide,
Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Partial loss of the original fabric |
No |
fortifications on the caribbean side of panama: portobelo-san lorenzoFortifications on the Caribbean Side of Panama: Portobelo-San Lorenzo | panama Panama | 2003 | Avalanche/ landslide,
Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation,
Other Threats: Weakening of the foundations by the vegetation |
No |
fortifications on the caribbean side of panama: portobelo-san lorenzoFortifications on the Caribbean Side of Panama: Portobelo-San Lorenzo | panama Panama | 2001 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, | No |
fortifications on the caribbean side of panama: portobelo-san lorenzoFortifications on the Caribbean Side of Panama: Portobelo-San Lorenzo | panama Panama | 2000 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: More attention to be paid to stone conservation |
No |
fortifications on the caribbean side of panama: portobelo-san lorenzoFortifications on the Caribbean Side of Panama: Portobelo-San Lorenzo | panama Panama | 1993 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: More attention to be paid to stone conservation |
No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.