Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

10
Reports
2
Properties concerned
1
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2007close
States Parties: Georgiaclose
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management activities Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: General need for interior and exterior conservation work on the monuments
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management activities Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: General need for interior and exterior conservation work of the monuments
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: High impact research / monitoring activities Management activities Water (rain/water table) Wind
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Loss of authenticity in recent works carried out by the Church
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Management activities Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Housing Management activities
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Housing Management activities
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Housing Management activities
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.209/14
Threats*: Financial resources High impact research / monitoring activities Housing Management activities Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Critical conditions of particularly two archaeological sites

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top