State of Conservation
12
Reports
8
Properties concerned
8
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2003close
Region:
Africaclose
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
air and tenere natural reservesAir and Ténéré Natural Reserves | niger Niger | 2003 | Legal framework,
Other Threats: Decline in wildlife populations |
Yes |
lamu old townLamu Old Town | kenya Kenya | 2003 | Legal framework, | No |
manovo-gounda st floris national parkManovo-Gounda St Floris National Park | central african republic Central African Republic | 2003 | Legal framework, | Yes |
mount kenya national park/natural forestMount Kenya National Park/Natural Forest | kenya Kenya | 2003 | Legal framework,
Other Threats: Uncontrolled forest land excisions, in the Mount Hombe and Ragat blocks |
No |
mount kenya national park/natural forestMount Kenya National Park/Natural Forest | kenya Kenya | 2002 | Legal framework,
Other Threats: Uncontrolled forest land excisions, in the Mount Hombe and Ragat blocks |
No |
mount nimba strict nature reserveMount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve | cote d'ivoire,guinea Côte d'Ivoire Guinea |
2003 | Legal framework, | Yes |
serengeti national parkSerengeti National Park | united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania | 2002 | Legal framework,
Other Threats: Threats to wildlife migration and populations |
No |
simien national parkSimien National Park | ethiopia Ethiopia | 2003 | Legal framework,
Other Threats: Loss of biodiversity |
Yes |
timbuktuTimbuktu | mali Mali | 1997 | Legal framework,
Other Threats: Vulnerability of the mosques |
Yes |
timbuktuTimbuktu | mali Mali | 1995 | Legal framework,
Other Threats: Vulnerability of the mosques |
Yes |
timbuktuTimbuktu | mali Mali | 1994 | Legal framework,
Other Threats: Vulnerability of the mosques |
Yes |
timbuktuTimbuktu | mali Mali | 1990 | Legal framework,
Other Threats: Vulnerability of the mosques |
No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.