State of Conservation
21
Reports
11
Properties concerned
7
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2014close
Region:
Africaclose
| States Parties: |
 Senegal
|
| Year: | 2003 |
| Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Mozambique
|
| Year: | 2014 |
| Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Growing number of collapsed or seriously dilapidated buildings |
| States Parties: |
 Kenya
|
| Year: | 2014 |
| Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Kenya
|
| Year: | 2003 |
| Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B,WHC.03/27.COM/7B.Corr |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Zimbabwe
|
| Year: | 2014 |
| Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Zimbabwe
|
| Year: | 2011 |
| Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Zimbabwe
|
| Year: | 2010 |
| Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Zambia Zimbabwe
|
| Year: | 2010 |
| Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Zambia Zimbabwe
|
| Year: | 2008 |
| Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Zambia Zimbabwe
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Zambia Zimbabwe
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Zambia Zimbabwe
|
| Year: | 1999 |
| Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Zambia Zimbabwe
|
| Year: | 1998 |
| Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 United Republic of Tanzania
|
| Year: | 2014 |
| Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
United Republic of Tanzania
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
United Republic of Tanzania
|
| Year: | 2009 |
| Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
United Republic of Tanzania
|
| Year: | 2004 |
| Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | a) Decline in animals population; b) Reduction of control fires |
| States Parties: |
 Nigeria
|
| Year: | 2014 |
| Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
United Republic of Tanzania
|
| Year: | 2009 |
| Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
United Republic of Tanzania
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
