State of Conservation
52
Reports
16
Properties concerned
11
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2010close
Region:
Africaclose
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Lack of documentation and equipment |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Housing |
States Parties: | Ghana |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Salt-laden atmosphere |
States Parties: | Ghana |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Salt-laden atmosphere |
States Parties: | Senegal |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | a) Risk of collapse of historic buildingsb) Construction of the replica of the Gorée Memorial |
States Parties: | Mozambique |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add.2 |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | b) Growing number of collapsed or seriously dilapidated buildings; |
States Parties: | Mozambique |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Growing number of collapsed or seriously dilapidated buildings; |
States Parties: | Mozambique |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | a) Delay in implementing rehabilitation of the San Sebastian Fortressb) Buildings threatened with collapse |
States Parties: | Mozambique |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Buildings threatened with collapse |
States Parties: | Mozambique |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Buildings threatened with collapse |
States Parties: | Mozambique |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Precarious state of conservation of the stone |
States Parties: | Mozambique |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Precarious state of conservation of the stone |
States Parties: | Mozambique |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Precarious state of conservation of the stone |
States Parties: | Mozambique |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Precarious state of conservation of the stone |
States Parties: | Mozambique |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Precarious state of conservation of the stone |
States Parties: | Senegal |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | f) Extremely poor state of conservation of numerous derelict buildings endangering occupants; |
States Parties: | Senegal |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Extremely poor state of conservation of numerous derelict buildings endangering occupants; |
States Parties: | Senegal |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Extremely poor state of conservation of numerous derelict buildings endangering occupants |
States Parties: | Zimbabwe |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Need for structural stabilization and repair of collapsed sections of walls |
States Parties: | Kenya |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add.2 |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Lack of adequate sewerage, waste disposal, and overall infrastructure, and risk to limited fresh water supplies; Fire |
States Parties
Democratic Republic of the Congo Ethiopia Ghana Kenya Mali Mozambique Senegal South Africa United Republic of Tanzania Zambia ZimbabweThreats
Housing 52
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.