State of Conservation
72
Reports
19
Properties concerned
11
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:2008close
Region:
Africaclose
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | a) Lack of appropriate conservation of the built heritageb) Lack of integration of natural values in management of sit |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | a) Difficulties with operational aspects of maintenance and conservation implementation ; b) Lack of appropriate conservation of the built heritage; c) Lack of integration of natural values in management of site |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | a) Natural values and cultural landscape qualities are not yet reflected in the islands management structure and conservation priorities; b) Fire |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Natural values and cultural landscape qualities are not yet reflected in the islands management structure and conservation priorities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Geological and architectural characteristics of the churches |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Major deterioration of nearly two-thirds of the earthen brick structures |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Grave degradation of nearly two thirds of the mud brick buildings |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Serious degradation of nearly 2/3 of the mud-brick constructions |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Serious degradation of nearly 2/3 of the mud-brick constructions |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/7 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/8A |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Danger List: | Yes |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.