Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

111
Reports
17
Properties concerned
13
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start: 1996close
Threats* : Avalanche/ landslideclose Earthquakeclose Erosion and siltation/ depositionclose Fire (widlfires)close Tsunami/tidal waveclose Volcanic eruptionclose
Region: Africaclose
States Parties: Madagascar
Year: 2014
Document Source: WHC-14/38.COM/7A
Threats*: Fire (widlfires)
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Madagascar
Year: 2013
Document Source: WHC-13/37.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Fire (widlfires)
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Madagascar
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7A
Threats*: Fire (widlfires)
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Madagascar
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Fire (widlfires)
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Madagascar
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Fire (widlfires)
States Parties: Madagascar
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Fire (widlfires)
States Parties: Ethiopia
Year: 2023
Initialy proposed for examination in 2022
Document Source: WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Earthquake
Other Threats: Impact of the four temporary shelters constructed in 2008; Demolition of most of the traditional “tukul” dwellings
States Parties: Ethiopia
Year: 2021
Document Source: WHC/21/44.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Earthquake
Other Threats: Impact of the four temporary shelters constructed in 2008; Demolition of most of the traditional “tukul” dwellings
States Parties: Ethiopia
Year: 2019
Document Source: WHC/19/43.COM/7B
Threats*: Earthquake
Other Threats: Impact of the four temporary shelters constructed in 2008; Demolition of most of the traditional “tukul” dwellings
States Parties: Ethiopia
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Earthquake
States Parties: Ethiopia
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: Earthquake
Other Threats: h) Geological and architectural characteristics of the churches.
States Parties: Ethiopia
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Earthquake
Other Threats: Geological and architectural characteristics of the churches.
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 2023
Document Source: WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add.2
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
Other Threats: Deterioration of the architectural heritage fabric
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 2021
Initialy proposed for examination in 2020
Document Source: WHC/21/44.COM/7B
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
Other Threats: Deterioration of the architectural heritage fabric
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 2018
Document Source: WHC/18/42.COM/7B
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
Other Threats: Deterioration of the architectural heritage fabric
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7B
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
Other Threats: Deterioration of the architectural heritage fabric
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 2013
Document Source: WHC-13/37.COM/7A
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
Other Threats: Deterioration of the architectural heritage fabric
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7A
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
Other Threats: Deterioration of the architectural heritage fabric
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7A
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
Other Threats: Deterioration of the architectural heritage fabric
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7A
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
Other Threats: Deterioration of the architectural heritage fabric
Danger List:  Yes

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top