Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

27
Reports
7
Properties concerned
5
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2012close
Threats* : Solid wasteclose
Region: Arab Statesclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
archaeological site of cyreneArchaeological Site of Cyrene libya Libya 2010 Solid waste,
Other Threats: Inadequate on-site security and control systems
No
archaeological site of cyreneArchaeological Site of Cyrene libya Libya 2009 Solid waste,
Other Threats: Inadequate on-site security and control systems
No
archaeological site of cyreneArchaeological Site of Cyrene libya Libya 2007 Solid waste, No
historic town of zabidHistoric Town of Zabid yemen Yemen 2004 Solid waste,
Other Threats: Deteriorated state of some of the monuments
Yes
historic town of zabidHistoric Town of Zabid yemen Yemen 2003 Solid waste,
Other Threats: Lack of conservation measures
Yes
historic town of zabidHistoric Town of Zabid yemen Yemen 2002 Solid waste,
Other Threats: Lack of conservation measures
Yes
historic town of zabidHistoric Town of Zabid yemen Yemen 2001 Solid waste,
Other Threats: Lack of conservation measures
Yes
historic town of zabidHistoric Town of Zabid yemen Yemen 2000 Solid waste,
Other Threats: Lack of conservation measures
No
historic town of zabidHistoric Town of Zabid yemen Yemen 1998 Solid waste, No
historic town of zabidHistoric Town of Zabid yemen Yemen 1997 Solid waste, No
historic town of zabidHistoric Town of Zabid yemen Yemen 1996 Solid waste, No
medina of essaouira (formerly mogador)Medina of Essaouira (formerly Mogador) morocco Morocco 2008 Solid waste,
Other Threats: a) Progressive deterioration of the built area b) Continuous collapse of buildingsc) Major deterioration of the maritime part of the fortifications of the Medina
No
medina of essaouira (formerly mogador)Medina of Essaouira (formerly Mogador) morocco Morocco 2006 Solid waste,
Other Threats: a) Progressive deterioration of the built framework; b) Continuous collapse of the buildings; c) Advanced deterioration of the maritime part of the fortified wall of the Medina
No
medina of essaouira (formerly mogador)Medina of Essaouira (formerly Mogador) morocco Morocco 2005 Solid waste,
Other Threats: a) Progressive deterioration of the built framework; b) Absence of a rehabilitation policy for the Mellah Quarter; c) Continuous collapse of the buildings and advanced deterioration of the maritime part of the fortified wall of the Medina
No
medina of essaouira (formerly mogador)Medina of Essaouira (formerly Mogador) morocco Morocco 2004 Solid waste,
Other Threats: The general state of conservation of the property is a cause for concern
No
medina of fezMedina of Fez morocco Morocco 2004 Solid waste, No
old city of jerusalem and its wallsOld City of Jerusalem and its Walls jerusalem (site proposed by jordan)Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) 2004 Solid waste,
Other Threats: a) Lack of maintenance; b) Natural factors
Yes
petraPetra jordan Jordan 2001 Solid waste,
Other Threats: Conservation of antiquities
No
petraPetra jordan Jordan 2000 Solid waste,
Other Threats: Conservation of antiquities
No
petraPetra jordan Jordan 1998 Solid waste,
Other Threats: Conservation of antiquities
No
petraPetra jordan Jordan 1997 Solid waste,
Other Threats: Conservation of antiquities
No
petraPetra jordan Jordan 1996 Solid waste,
Other Threats: Conservation of antiquities
No
petraPetra jordan Jordan 1995 Solid waste,
Other Threats: Conservation of antiquities
No
petraPetra jordan Jordan 1994 Solid waste,
Other Threats: Conservation of antiquities
No
tipasaTipasa algeria Algeria 2007 Solid waste,
Other Threats: Poor conservation conditons for the archeological remains
No
tipasaTipasa algeria Algeria 2006 Solid waste, Yes
tipasaTipasa algeria Algeria 2005 Solid waste,
Other Threats: vegetation with roots seriously affecting archaeological remains
Yes

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top