State of Conservation
12
Reports
5
Properties concerned
4
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2002close
Region:
Latin America and the Caribbeanclose
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
antigua guatemalaAntigua Guatemala | guatemala Guatemala | 1993 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure,
Other Threats: Numerous ruins in the city that in danger of collapse in the event of an earthquake |
No |
city of quitoCity of Quito | ecuador Ecuador | 1999 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, | No |
city of quitoCity of Quito | ecuador Ecuador | 1998 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, | No |
city of quitoCity of Quito | ecuador Ecuador | 1993 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, | No |
city of quitoCity of Quito | ecuador Ecuador | 1990 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, | No |
historic centre of the town of olindaHistoric Centre of the Town of Olinda | brazil Brazil | 1993 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, | No |
historic centre of the town of olindaHistoric Centre of the Town of Olinda | brazil Brazil | 1987 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, | No |
historic town of ouro pretoHistoric Town of Ouro Preto | brazil Brazil | 1990 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, | No |
huascarán national parkHuascarán National Park | peru Peru | 2001 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, | No |
huascarán national parkHuascarán National Park | peru Peru | 2000 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, | No |
huascarán national parkHuascarán National Park | peru Peru | 1999 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, | No |
huascarán national parkHuascarán National Park | peru Peru | 1998 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.