State of Conservation
102
Reports
15
Properties concerned
8
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2019close
Region:
Latin America and the Caribbeanclose
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community |
Other Threats: | Weakening of the foundations by the vegetation |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community |
Other Threats: | More attention to be paid to stone conservation |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community |
Other Threats: | More attention to be paid to stone conservation |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2018 |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community |
Other Threats: | Educational reform not implemented. |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community |
Other Threats: | Educational reform not implemented. |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community |
Other Threats: | h) Educational reform not implemented |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community |
Other Threats: | Educational reform not implemented. |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community |
Other Threats: | Educational reform not implemented |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B,WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Corr |
Threats*: | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community |
Other Threats: | Material decay and abandonment of buildings, as well as the effect of heavy traffic on historic buildings |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1986 |
Document Source: | CC-86/CONF.001/11,CC-86/CONF.003/INF.4 |
Threats*: | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1985 |
Document Source: | SC-85/CONF.008/9 |
Threats*: | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community |
Danger List: | Yes |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.