Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

29
Reports
10
Properties concerned
8
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date end:2004close
Threats* : Financial resourcesclose
Region: Latin America and the Caribbeanclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
chavin (archaeological site)Chavin (Archaeological Site) peru Peru 2003 Financial resources,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the site
 No
chavin (archaeological site)Chavin (Archaeological Site) peru Peru 2002 Financial resources,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the site
 No
chavin (archaeological site)Chavin (Archaeological Site) peru Peru 2001 Financial resources,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the site
 No
chavin (archaeological site)Chavin (Archaeological Site) peru Peru 2000 Financial resources,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the site
 No
chavin (archaeological site)Chavin (Archaeological Site) peru Peru 1999 Financial resources,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the site
 No
chavin (archaeological site)Chavin (Archaeological Site) peru Peru 1998 Financial resources,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the site
 No
chavin (archaeological site)Chavin (Archaeological Site) peru Peru 1993 Financial resources,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the site
 No
city of cuzcoCity of Cuzco peru Peru 2004 Financial resources,
Other Threats: Deliberate neglect of historic properties
No
city of quitoCity of Quito ecuador Ecuador 1999 Financial resources, No
city of quitoCity of Quito ecuador Ecuador 1998 Financial resources, No
city of quitoCity of Quito ecuador Ecuador 1993 Financial resources, No
cocos island national parkCocos Island National Park costa rica Costa Rica 2002 Financial resources, No
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands ecuador Ecuador 2004 Financial resources,
Other Threats: a) Weaknesses in quarantine measures; b) Passage of international and national marine traffic
 No
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands ecuador Ecuador 2003 Financial resources, No
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands ecuador Ecuador 2002 Financial resources, No
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands ecuador Ecuador 2001 Financial resources, No
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands ecuador Ecuador 2000 Financial resources, No
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands ecuador Ecuador 1999 Financial resources, No
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands ecuador Ecuador 1998 Financial resources, No
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands ecuador Ecuador 1997 Financial resources, No
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands ecuador Ecuador 1996 Financial resources, No
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands ecuador Ecuador 1995 Financial resources, No
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands ecuador Ecuador 1994 Financial resources, No
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands ecuador Ecuador 1992 Financial resources, No
huascarán national parkHuascarán National Park peru Peru 1995 Financial resources, No
jesuit missions of la santisima trinidad de paraná and jesus de tavarangueJesuit Missions of La Santísima Trinidad de Paraná and Jesús de Tavarangue paraguay Paraguay 2003 Financial resources, No
jesuit missions of the guaranis: san ignacio mini, santa ana, nuestra senora de loreto and santa maria mayor (argentina), ruins of sao miguel das missoes (brazil)Jesuit Missions of the Guaranis: San Ignacio Mini, Santa Ana, Nuestra Señora de Loreto and Santa Maria Mayor (Argentina), Ruins of Sao Miguel das Missoes (Brazil) argentina,brazil Argentina
Brazil		 2003 Financial resources, No
national history park – citadel, sans souci, ramiersNational History Park – Citadel, Sans Souci, Ramiers haiti Haiti 1993 Financial resources,
Other Threats: Consolidation of the Sans Souci Palace and rehabilitation of the Royal Gardens required
 No
rio plátano biosphere reserveRío Plátano Biosphere Reserve honduras Honduras 2003 Financial resources, Yes

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top