State of Conservation
10
Reports
10
Properties concerned
8
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2004close
Date end:2004close
Region:
Asia and the Pacificclose
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
chitwan national parkChitwan National Park | nepal Nepal | 2004 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
complex of hue monumentsComplex of Hué Monuments | viet nam Viet Nam | 2004 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Need for restoration and enhancement of the monumental architecture of Hué |
No |
group of monuments at hampiGroup of Monuments at Hampi | india India | 2004 | Ground transport infrastructure, | Yes |
historic monuments of ancient naraHistoric Monuments of Ancient Nara | japan Japan | 2004 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
lorentz national parkLorentz National Park | indonesia Indonesia | 2004 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: a) Security limitations on staff and public access to parts of the Park; b) Fire |
No |
minaret and archaeological remains of jamMinaret and Archaeological Remains of Jam | afghanistan Afghanistan | 2004 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Need for consolidation and restoration of the monument |
Yes |
phong nha-ke bang national parkPhong Nha-Ke Bang National Park | viet nam Viet Nam | 2004 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
rice terraces of the philippine cordillerasRice Terraces of the Philippine Cordilleras | philippines Philippines | 2004 | Ground transport infrastructure, | Yes |
town of luang prabangTown of Luang Prabang | lao people's democratic republic Lao People's Democratic Republic | 2004 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
vat phou and associated ancient settlements within the champasak cultural landscapeVat Phou and Associated Ancient Settlements within the Champasak Cultural Landscape | lao people's democratic republic Lao People's Democratic Republic | 2004 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.