State of Conservation
22
Reports
22
Properties concerned
14
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2005close
Date end:2005close
Region:
Asia and the Pacificclose
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
agra fortAgra Fort | india |
2005 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Threats to monuments’ foundations due to geological instability of riverbank |
No |
borobudur temple compoundsBorobudur Temple Compounds | indonesia |
2005 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Uncontrolled vendors within and around the property |
No |
champaner-pavagadh archaeological parkChampaner-Pavagadh Archaeological Park | india |
2005 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
cultural landscape and archaeological remains of the bamiyan valleyCultural Landscape and Archaeological Remains of the Bamiyan Valley | afghanistan |
2005 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: a) Consolidation of the cliffs and nichesb) Lack of a long-term on-site monitoring systemc) Demining |
Yes |
east rennellEast Rennell | solomon islands |
2005 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Disappointment, confusion, suspicion, division and anger within the community |
No |
fatehpur sikriFatehpur Sikri | india |
2005 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Threats to monuments’ foundations due to geological instability of riverbank |
No |
fort and shalamar gardens in lahoreFort and Shalamar Gardens in Lahore | pakistan |
2005 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: a) Lack of capacity in conservation techniques; b) Lack of monitoring system |
Yes |
group of monuments at hampiGroup of Monuments at Hampi | india |
2005 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: rural poverty |
Yes |
historic centre of shakhrisyabzHistoric Centre of Shakhrisyabz | uzbekistan |
2005 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
imperial palaces of the ming and qing dynasties in beijing and shenyangImperial Palaces of the Ming and Qing Dynasties in Beijing and Shenyang | china |
2005 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
kathmandu valleyKathmandu Valley | nepal |
2005 | Management systems/ management plan, | Yes |
lorentz national parkLorentz National Park | indonesia |
2005 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
lumbini, the birthplace of the lord buddhaLumbini, the Birthplace of the Lord Buddha | nepal |
2005 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Impact of new structure of the Maya Devi Temple in the core area |
No |
mahabodhi temple complex at bodh gayaMahabodhi Temple Complex at Bodh Gaya | india |
2005 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
minaret and archaeological remains of jamMinaret and Archaeological Remains of Jam | afghanistan |
2005 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Leaning of the Minaret |
Yes |
old town of galle and its fortificationsOld Town of Galle and its Fortifications | sri lanka |
2005 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Lack of maintenance of historic buildings and lack of control on building activities within the World Heritage historic centre |
No |
phong nha-ke bang national parkPhong Nha-Ke Bang National Park | viet nam |
2005 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
rice terraces of the philippine cordillerasRice Terraces of the Philippine Cordilleras | philippines |
2005 | Management systems/ management plan, | Yes |
ruins of the buddhist vihara at paharpurRuins of the Buddhist Vihara at Paharpur | bangladesh |
2005 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Lack of monitoring system |
No |
state historical and cultural park “ancient merv”State Historical and Cultural Park “Ancient Merv” | turkmenistan |
2005 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
taj mahalTaj Mahal | india |
2005 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Threats to monuments’ foundations due to geological instability of riverbank |
No |
town of luang prabangTown of Luang Prabang | lao people's democratic republic |
2005 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.