Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

9
Reports
9
Properties concerned
5
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date Start: 2001close
Date end:2001close
Threats* : Management systems/ management planclose
Region: Asia and the Pacificclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
australian fossil mammal sites (riversleigh / naracoorte)Australian Fossil Mammal Sites (Riversleigh / Naracoorte) australia Australia 2001 Management systems/ management plan, No
great barrier reefGreat Barrier Reef australia Australia 2001 Management systems/ management plan, No
gunung mulu national parkGunung Mulu National Park malaysia Malaysia 2001 Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Lack of inclusion of indigenous peoples and their claims in the decision to extend the Park
 No
ha long bay - cat ba archipelagoHa Long Bay - Cat Ba Archipelago viet nam Viet Nam 2001 Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Rapid economic development
 No
k’gari (fraser island)K’gari (Fraser Island) australia Australia 2001 Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Risk to humans posed by the dingo population
No
komodo national parkKomodo National Park indonesia Indonesia 2001 Management systems/ management plan, No
lorentz national parkLorentz National Park indonesia Indonesia 2001 Management systems/ management plan, No
sinharaja forest reserveSinharaja Forest Reserve sri lanka Sri Lanka 2001 Management systems/ management plan, No
wet tropics of queenslandWet Tropics of Queensland australia Australia 2001 Management systems/ management plan, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top