State of Conservation
12
Reports
12
Properties concerned
9
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start:
2010close
Date end:2010close
Region:
Asia and the Pacificclose
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
angkorAngkor | cambodia |
2010 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
bam and its cultural landscapeBam and its Cultural Landscape | iran (islamic republic of) |
2010 | Management systems/ management plan, | Yes |
champaner-pavagadh archaeological parkChampaner-Pavagadh Archaeological Park | india |
2010 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
fort and shalamar gardens in lahoreFort and Shalamar Gardens in Lahore | pakistan |
2010 | Management systems/ management plan, | Yes |
group of monuments at hampiGroup of Monuments at Hampi | india |
2010 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
historic centre of bukharaHistoric Centre of Bukhara | uzbekistan |
2010 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
mahabodhi temple complex at bodh gayaMahabodhi Temple Complex at Bodh Gaya | india |
2010 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: b) Loss of character of the cultural landscape directly associated with the property and its outstanding universal value; |
No |
minaret and archaeological remains of jamMinaret and Archaeological Remains of Jam | afghanistan |
2010 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Inclination of the Minaret |
Yes |
old town of galle and its fortificationsOld Town of Galle and its Fortifications | sri lanka |
2010 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
parthian fortresses of nisaParthian Fortresses of Nisa | turkmenistan |
2010 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
rice terraces of the philippine cordillerasRice Terraces of the Philippine Cordilleras | philippines |
2010 | Management systems/ management plan, | Yes |
temple of preah vihearTemple of Preah Vihear | cambodia |
2010 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.