State of Conservation
12
Reports
7
Properties concerned
4
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date end:1991close
Region:
Asia and the Pacificclose
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
chitwan national parkChitwan National Park | nepal |
1991 | Water (extraction) , | No |
chitwan national parkChitwan National Park | nepal |
1990 | Water (extraction) , | No |
great barrier reefGreat Barrier Reef | australia |
1986 | Ground transport infrastructure, Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, Mining, | No |
great barrier reefGreat Barrier Reef | australia |
1985 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
keoladeo national parkKeoladeo National Park | india |
1990 | Invasive/alien terrestrial species,
Water (extraction) ,
Other Threats: Decline in the population of Siberian cranes |
No |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india |
1991 | Civil unrest, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Illegal activities, Land conversion, | No |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india |
1990 | Civil unrest, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Illegal activities, Land conversion, | No |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india |
1989 | Civil unrest, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Illegal activities, Land conversion, | No |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india |
1986 | Water infrastructure, | No |
sagarmatha national parkSagarmatha National Park | nepal |
1989 |
Other Threats: Fire at the Tengboche monastery |
No |
te wahipounamu – south west new zealandTe Wahipounamu – South West New Zealand | new zealand |
1989 | Water infrastructure, | No |
wet tropics of queenslandWet Tropics of Queensland | australia |
1991 | Financial resources, Management systems/ management plan, Water infrastructure, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.