State of Conservation
31
Reports
12
Properties concerned
8
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2008close
Region:
Europe and North Americaclose
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.207/INF.8,WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Loss of biodiversity |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/18 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Loss of biodiversity |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-01/CONF.208/INF.5,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Loss of biodiversity |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Need for a comprehensive rehabilitation programme |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B.Add |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Danger List: | Yes |
Threats
Financial resources 31
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.