Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

14
Reports
3
Properties concerned
3
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 2005close
Threats* : Ground water pollutionclose
Region: Europe and North Americaclose
Everglades National Park (2016)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7A
Threats*: Ground water pollution
Other Threats: Mercury contamination of fish and wildlife
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (2015)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2015
Document Source: WHC-15/39.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Ground water pollution
Other Threats: Mercury contamination of fish and wildlife
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (2014)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2014
Document Source: WHC-14/38.COM/7A
Threats*: Ground water pollution
Other Threats: Mercury contamination of fish and wildlife
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (2013)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2013
Document Source: Summary of the implementation of the corrective measures, prepared by the Secretariat / Résumé de la mise en oeuvre des mesures correctives, préparé par le Secrétariat (en anglais),WHC-13/37.COM/7A
Threats*: Ground water pollution
Other Threats: Mercury contamination of fish and wildlife
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (2012)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7A
Threats*: Ground water pollution
Other Threats: Mercury contamination of fish and wildlife
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (2011)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Ground water pollution
Other Threats: Mercury contamination of fish and wildlife
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (2010)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground water pollution
Other Threats: Mercury contamination of fish and wildlife
Everglades National Park (2008)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground water pollution
Other Threats: Mercury contamination of fish and wildlife
Everglades National Park (2007)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7A
Threats*: Ground water pollution
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (2006)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A
Threats*: Ground water pollution
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (2005)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Ground water pollution
Danger List:  Yes
Lake Baikal (2009)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground water pollution
Wood Buffalo National Park (2023)
States Parties: Canada
Year: 2023
Initialy proposed for examination in 2022
Document Source: WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Ground water pollution
Other Threats: Lack of engagement with First Nations and Metis in monitoring activities and insufficient consideration of traditional ecological knowledge; Insufficiently understood cumulative impacts of multiple development pressures
Wood Buffalo National Park (2021)
States Parties: Canada
Year: 2021
Document Source: WHC/21/44.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Ground water pollution
Other Threats: Lack of engagement with First Nations and Metis in monitoring activities and insufficient consideration of traditional ecological knowledge; Insufficiently understood cumulative impacts of multiple development pressures
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Canada Russian Federation United States of America
Threats
Ground water pollution 14

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top