State of Conservation
6
Reports
4
Properties concerned
22
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2012close
Region:
Europe and North Americaclose
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
ancient and primeval beech forests of the carpathians and other regions of europeAncient and Primeval Beech Forests of the Carpathians and Other Regions of Europe | albania,austria,belgium,bosnia and herzegovina,bulgaria,croatia,czechia,france,germany,italy,north macedonia,poland,romania,slovakia,slovenia,spain,switzerland,ukraine Albania Austria Bosnia and Herzegovina Belgium Bulgaria Switzerland Czechia Germany Spain France Croatia Italy North Macedonia Poland Romania Slovenia Slovakia Ukraine |
2014 | Localised utilities, | No |
ancient and primeval beech forests of the carpathians and other regions of europeAncient and Primeval Beech Forests of the Carpathians and Other Regions of Europe | albania,austria,belgium,bosnia and herzegovina,bulgaria,croatia,czechia,france,germany,italy,north macedonia,poland,romania,slovakia,slovenia,spain,switzerland,ukraine Albania Austria Bosnia and Herzegovina Belgium Bulgaria Switzerland Czechia Germany Spain France Croatia Italy North Macedonia Poland Romania Slovenia Slovakia Ukraine |
2013 | Localised utilities, | No |
curonian spitCuronian Spit | lithuania,russian federation Lithuania Russian Federation |
2018 | Localised utilities, | No |
curonian spitCuronian Spit | lithuania,russian federation Lithuania Russian Federation |
2016 | Localised utilities, | No |
derwent valley millsDerwent Valley Mills | united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | 2024 | Localised utilities,
Other Threats: Poor state of conservation of the large Belper Mills complex |
No |
historical monuments of mtskhetaHistorical Monuments of Mtskheta | georgia Georgia | 2013 | Localised utilities, | Yes |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.