State of Conservation
7
Reports
7
Properties concerned
6
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start:
2018close
Date end:2018close
Threats* : Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructureclose
Air transport infrastructureclose
Ground transport infrastructureclose
Marine transport infrastructureclose
Underground transport infrastructureclose
Region:
Europe and North Americaclose
States Parties: | Poland |
Year: | 2018 |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Slow process of consultation with local communities |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2018 |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B.Add2 |
Threats*: | Air transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Poor state of conservation of the monastic irrigation system |
States Parties: | Lithuania Russian Federation |
Year: | 2018 |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure Marine transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Türkiye |
Year: | 2018 |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure Underground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | decay and loss of Ottoman/vernacular architecture |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2018 |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Marine transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Structural integrity issues at the Church of the Transfiguration |
States Parties: | Montenegro |
Year: | 2018 |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2018 |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Ground transport infrastructure Underground transport infrastructure |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.