State of Conservation
214
Reports
47
Properties concerned
31
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
1994close
Region:
Europe and North Americaclose
States Parties: | Albania Austria Bosnia and Herzegovina Belgium Bulgaria Switzerland Czechia Germany Spain France Croatia Italy North Macedonia Poland Romania Slovenia Slovakia Ukraine |
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Albania Austria Bosnia and Herzegovina Belgium Bulgaria Switzerland Czechia Germany Spain France Croatia Italy North Macedonia Poland Romania Slovenia Slovakia Ukraine |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Poland |
Year: | 2023 |
Document Source: | WHC/23/45.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Slow process of consultation with local communities |
States Parties: | Poland |
Year: |
2021
Initialy proposed for examination in 2020
|
Document Source: | WHC/21/44.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Slow process of consultation with local communities |
States Parties: | Poland |
Year: | 2018 |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Slow process of consultation with local communities |
States Parties: | Poland |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Slow process of consultation with local communities. |
States Parties: | Belgium France |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Belgium France |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | France |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | France |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | France |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Poland |
Year: | 2024 |
Document Source: | WHC/24/46.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Lack of overall development plan for the property and its buffer zone |
States Parties: | Poland |
Year: | 2023 |
Document Source: | WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add.2 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | impact on the Outstanding Universal Value of the property of the rebuilt Pavilion |
States Parties: | Poland |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | impact on the Outstanding Universal Value of the property of the rebuilt Pavilion |
States Parties: | Poland |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Italy |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Italy |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Italy |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Italy |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Italy |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties
Albania Austria Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Canada Croatia Cyprus Czechia France Germany Greece Hungary Italy Lithuania Malta Montenegro Netherlands (Kingdom of the) North Macedonia Poland Romania Russian Federation Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Türkiye Ukraine United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United States of America
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.