Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

9
Reports
9
Properties concerned
8
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date Start: 2003close
Date end:2003close
Threats* : Management systems/ management planclose
Region: Europe and North Americaclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
białowieża forestBiałowieża Forest belarus,poland Belarus
Poland		 2003 Management systems/ management plan, No
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 2003 Management systems/ management plan, Yes
giant's causeway and causeway coastGiant's Causeway and Causeway Coast united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 2003 Management systems/ management plan, No
henderson islandHenderson Island united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 2003 Management systems/ management plan, No
isole eolie (aeolian islands)Isole Eolie (Aeolian Islands) italy Italy 2003 Management systems/ management plan, No
lake baikalLake Baikal russian federation Russian Federation 2003 Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population
No
nahanni national parkNahanni National Park canada Canada 2003 Management systems/ management plan, No
srebarna nature reserveSrebarna Nature Reserve bulgaria Bulgaria 2003 Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Loss of biodiversity
 Yes
yellowstone national parkYellowstone National Park united states of america United States of America 2003 Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Wildlife infection and transmission to domestic stock
 Yes

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top