State of Conservation
677
Reports
146
Properties concerned
40
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
1986close
Region:
Europe and North Americaclose
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add.2 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Weakening of conservation controls |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: |
|
Year: |
2023
Initialy proposed for examination in 2022
|
Document Source: | WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Lack of engagement with First Nations and Metis in monitoring activities and insufficient consideration of traditional ecological knowledge; Insufficiently understood cumulative impacts of multiple development pressures |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2021 |
Document Source: | WHC/21/44.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Lack of engagement with First Nations and Metis in monitoring activities and insufficient consideration of traditional ecological knowledge; Insufficiently understood cumulative impacts of multiple development pressures |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Lack of engagement with First Nations and Metis in monitoring activities and insufficient consideration of traditional ecological knowledge |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Lack of engagement with First Nations and Metis in monitoring activities and insufficient consideration of traditional ecological knowledge |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add. |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1991 |
Document Source: | SC-91/CONF.002/3 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Wildlife infection and transmission to domestic stock |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/18 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Wildlife infection and transmission to domestic stock |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties
Albania Andorra Austria Azerbaijan Belarus Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Canada Croatia Czechia Denmark Estonia France Georgia Germany Greece Hungary Ireland Italy Lithuania Malta Montenegro Netherlands (Kingdom of the) North Macedonia Norway Poland Portugal Romania Russian Federation Serbia Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Türkiye Ukraine United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United States of America
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.