State of Conservation
232
Reports
42
Properties concerned
28
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
Other Threats: | Serious degradation of the city’s heritage (many houses and the ancient souq are in an alarming deterioration state) |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
Other Threats: | Serious degradation of the city’s heritage (many houses and the ancient souq are in an alarming deterioration state) |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
Other Threats: | Serious degradation of the city’s heritage (many houses and the ancient souq are in an alarming deterioration state) |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
Other Threats: | Serious degradation of the city’s heritage (many houses and the ancient souk are in an alarming deterioration state) ; Lack of conservation measures and supportive developments. |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7A,WHC/17/41.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
Other Threats: | Serious deterioration of the city’s heritage |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
Other Threats: | Serious deterioration of the city's heritage |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2024 |
Document Source: | WHC/24/46.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
Other Threats: | Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tomb |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2023 |
Document Source: | WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
Other Threats: | Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tomb |
States Parties: |
|
Year: |
2021
Initialy proposed for examination in 2020
|
Document Source: | WHC/21/44.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
Other Threats: | Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tomb |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7B,WHC/19/43.COM/INF.7.Rev.4 |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
Other Threats: | Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tomb |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
Other Threats: | Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tomb |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2023 |
Document Source: | WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add.2 |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
States Parties: |
|
Year: |
2021
Initialy proposed for examination in 2020
|
Document Source: | WHC/21/44.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2018 |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties
Albania Algeria Bahrain China Dominican Republic Egypt Ethiopia Georgia Ghana India Indonesia Jordan Kenya Lebanon Libya Mali Montenegro Nepal Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Russian Federation Sudan Syrian Arab Republic Türkiye United Republic of Tanzania YemenThreats
Land conversion 232
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.