State of Conservation
30
Reports
30
Properties concerned
30
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2015close
Date end:2015close
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Afghanistan |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7A.Add,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7Rev |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Risk of imminent collapse of the Giant Buddha niches; Irreversible deterioration of the mural paintings |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Thailand |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Forest fragmentation / Need for ecological corridors |
States Parties: | Gabon |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Türkiye |
Year: | 2015 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areas); Land Reclamation project |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Austria |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7Rev |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Indonesia |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Nothofagus dieback |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7Rev |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Senegal |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7A.Add,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7Rev |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Democratic Republic of the Congo |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Nigeria |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Jordan |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7Rev |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Bahrain |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Uzbekistan |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Conservation of urban fabric |
States Parties: | Central African Republic Congo Cameroon |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Declining populations of Walia ibex, Ethiopian wolf and other large mammal species |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties
Afghanistan Austria Bahrain Cameroon Central African Republic China Congo Costa Rica Democratic Republic of the Congo Ethiopia Gabon Germany India Indonesia Jordan Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Nepal Nigeria Panama Peru Russian Federation Senegal Syrian Arab Republic Thailand Türkiye Uganda United Republic of Tanzania Uzbekistan Yemen
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.