Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

10
Reports
10
Properties concerned
11
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start: 2002close
Date end:2002close
Threats* : Financial resourcesclose
States Parties: Albania
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/18
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: Need for monitoring of the situation at the site
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: Deterioration of the site
States Parties: Costa Rica
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Financial resources
States Parties: Ecuador
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Financial resources
States Parties: India
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: Elephant-human conflicts
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population
States Parties: Côte d'Ivoire Guinea
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/18
Threats*: Financial resources
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Bulgaria
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/18
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: Loss of biodiversity
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Algeria
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: Deterioration of the archaeological vestiges
States Parties: Democratic Republic of the Congo
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/18
Threats*: Financial resources
Danger List:  Yes

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top