State of Conservation
10
Reports
10
Properties concerned
11
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2002close
Date end:2002close
States Parties: | Albania |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/18 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Need for monitoring of the situation at the site |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the site |
States Parties: | Costa Rica |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Elephant-human conflicts |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population |
States Parties: | Côte d'Ivoire Guinea |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/18 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Bulgaria |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/18 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Loss of biodiversity |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Algeria |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the archaeological vestiges |
States Parties: | Democratic Republic of the Congo |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/18 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Danger List: | Yes |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.