State of Conservation
23
Reports
10
Properties concerned
9
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2005close
Region:
Europe and North Americaclose
States Parties: | Greece |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Poland |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Poland |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Poland |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.207/INF.6,WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Poland |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Albania |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | a) Lack of adequate protection and conservation of the site; b) Serious deterioration of materials resulting in an important loss of cultural significance |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2 |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Malta |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Cyprus |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Italy |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Italy |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Slovenia |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Risks of collapse |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B,WHC.03/27.COM/7B.Corr |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Risks of collapse |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2 |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Risks of collapse |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Risks of collapse |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.