Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

23
Reports
7
Properties concerned
5
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date end:2005close
Threats* : Oil and gasclose
Region: Europe and North Americaclose
Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks (1998)
States Parties: Canada
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Oil and gas
Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks (1997)
States Parties: Canada
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B
Threats*: Oil and gas
Curonian Spit (2004)
States Parties: Lithuania Russian Federation
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Oil and gas
Curonian Spit (2003)
States Parties: Lithuania Russian Federation
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Oil and gas
Curonian Spit (2002)
States Parties: Lithuania Russian Federation
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Oil and gas
Curonian Spit (2001)
States Parties: Lithuania Russian Federation
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Oil and gas
Dinosaur Provincial Park (1992)
States Parties: Canada
Year: 1992
Document Source: CLT-92/CONF.003/3,WHC-92/CONF.002/5
Threats*: Oil and gas
Dinosaur Provincial Park (1991)
States Parties: Canada
Year: 1991
Document Source: SC-91/CONF.002/4 Add.
Threats*: Oil and gas
Lake Baikal (2003)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Oil and gas
Other Threats: Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population
Lake Baikal (2002)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Oil and gas
Other Threats: Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population
Lake Baikal (2001)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.207/INF.8,WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Oil and gas
Other Threats: Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population
Miguasha National Park (2005)
States Parties: Canada
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Oil and gas
St Kilda (2002)
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2
Threats*: Oil and gas
St Kilda (2001)
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Oil and gas
St Kilda (1999)
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14
Threats*: Oil and gas
St Kilda (1998)
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Oil and gas
Yellowstone National Park (2001)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4
Threats*: Oil and gas
Other Threats: Infection threat to bison population
Danger List:  Yes
Yellowstone National Park (2000)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9
Threats*: Oil and gas
Other Threats: Infection threat to bison population
Danger List:  Yes
Yellowstone National Park (1999)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.209/13
Threats*: Oil and gas
Other Threats: Infection threat to bison population
Danger List:  Yes
Yellowstone National Park (1998)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.203/7
Threats*: Oil and gas
Other Threats: Infection threat to bison population
Danger List:  Yes
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Canada Lithuania Russian Federation United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United States of America
Threats
Oil and gas 23

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top