State of Conservation
States Parties: | Mauritius |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Mauritius |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | CLT-92/CONF.003/2,WHC-92/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Spain |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | State of dilapidation of the Puerta Elvira area |
States Parties: | Spain |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Spain |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B,WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Bulgaria |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Cambodia |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Cambodia |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Guatemala |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Guatemala |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Numerous ruins in the city that in danger of collapse in the event of an earthquake |
States Parties: | Italy |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Series of structural collapses at the property |
States Parties
Albania Algeria Argentina Australia Austria Azerbaijan Belarus Brazil Bulgaria Cambodia China Croatia Cuba Czechia Denmark Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt Estonia France Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Honduras India Indonesia Italy Japan Jordan Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Lithuania Malta Mauritania Mauritius Mexico Montenegro Morocco Nepal Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Republic of Korea Romania Russian Federation Senegal South Africa Spain Sri Lanka Thailand Türkiye Uganda United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Uruguay Uzbekistan Viet Nam Zambia Zimbabwe
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.