State of Conservation
21
Reports
5
Properties concerned
5
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2011close
Region:
Arab Statesclose
States Parties: | Tunisia |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | CLT-92/CONF.003/2,WHC-92/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties: | Oman |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the earthen structures of the Fort; |
States Parties: | Oman |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the earthen structures of the Fort |
States Parties: | Oman |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the earthen structures of the Fort |
States Parties: | Oman |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the earthen structure of the Fort |
States Parties: | Oman |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Oman |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Oman |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/18 |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Morocco |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Other Threats: | a) Progressive deterioration of the built area b) Continuous collapse of buildingsc) Major deterioration of the maritime part of the fortifications of the Medina |
States Parties: | Morocco |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Other Threats: | a) Progressive deterioration of the built framework; b) Continuous collapse of the buildings; c) Advanced deterioration of the maritime part of the fortified wall of the Medina |
States Parties: | Morocco |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Other Threats: | a) Progressive deterioration of the built framework; b) Absence of a rehabilitation policy for the Mellah Quarter; c) Continuous collapse of the buildings and advanced deterioration of the maritime part of the fortified wall of the Medina |
States Parties: | Morocco |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Other Threats: | The general state of conservation of the property is a cause for concern |
States Parties: | Jordan |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Other Threats: | Conservation of antiquities |
States Parties: | Jordan |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Other Threats: | Conservation of antiquities |
States Parties: | Jordan |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Other Threats: | Conservation of antiquities |
States Parties: | Jordan |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Other Threats: | Conservation of antiquities |
States Parties: | Jordan |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Other Threats: | Conservation of antiquities |
States Parties: | Jordan |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Other Threats: | Conservation of antiquities |
States Parties: | Jordan |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Other Threats: | Conservation of antiquities |
States Parties: | Lebanon |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.