State of Conservation
27
Reports
10
Properties concerned
9
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2005close
Region:
Europe and North Americaclose
States Parties: | Belarus Poland |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Other Threats: | a) Effect on forest biomes through drainage of agricultural land on the Belarus side and a reservoir on the Polish side; b) Presence of an artificial fence along the international boundary impeding large mammal movement. |
States Parties: | Albania |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Other Threats: | a) Lack of adequate protection and conservation of the site; b) Poor state of conservation of the property ; c) Insufficient implementation of the recommendations of the joint missions |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Albania |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Other Threats: | a) Lack of adequate protection and conservation of the site; b) Serious deterioration of materials resulting in an important loss of cultural significance |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Other Threats: | Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Other Threats: | Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.207/INF.8,WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Other Threats: | Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: | Malta |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: | Malta |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: | Bulgaria |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: | Bulgaria |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: | Croatia |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7A,WHC-96/CONF.201/INF.14,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Other Threats: | Neglected Park infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Croatia |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Croatia |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add. |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Croatia |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.001/3,WHC-93/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Croatia |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | CLT-92/CONF.003/3,WHC-92/CONF.002/5,WHC-92/CONF.002/7 Rev |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: | Croatia |
Year: | 1991 |
Document Source: | SC-91/CONF.002/4 |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.