State of Conservation
10
Reports
10
Properties concerned
11
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2016close
Date end:2016close
States Parties: | Belarus Poland |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
States Parties: | Solomon Islands |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7A.Add.2 |
Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
States Parties: | Senegal |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7A.Add.2 |
Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | State of Palestine |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
Other Threats: | Potential construction of a separation fence (wall) |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Saint Lucia |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
States Parties: | Honduras |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
Other Threats: | Significant decline of wildlife populations due to poaching |
Danger List: | Yes |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.