State of Conservation
572
Reports
67
Properties concerned
58
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date end:2016close
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: | Belarus Poland |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: | Belarus Poland |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Other Threats: | a) Alterations of the hydrological regime; b) Border fence impeding mammal movements |
States Parties: | Belarus Poland |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Other Threats: | a) Alterations of the hydrological regime; b) Border fence impeding mammal movements |
States Parties: | Belarus Poland |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Other Threats: | a) Alterations of the hydrological regime; b) Border fence impeding mammal movements |
States Parties: | Belarus Poland |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Other Threats: | a) Alterations of the hydrological regime; b) Border fence impeding mammal movement |
States Parties: | Belarus Poland |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Other Threats: | a) Effect on forest biomes through drainage of agricultural land on the Belarus side and a reservoir on the Polish side; b) Presence of an artificial fence along the international boundary impeding large mammal movement. |
States Parties: | Uganda |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: | Uganda |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: | Uganda |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: | Uganda |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.201/4 |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: | Sri Lanka |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: | Costa Rica |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: | Côte d'Ivoire |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Côte d'Ivoire |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties
Albania Argentina Australia Austria Bangladesh Belarus Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Cameroon Central African Republic China Colombia Congo Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Czechia Democratic Republic of the Congo Ecuador Ethiopia France Germany Guinea Honduras India Indonesia Italy Kenya Madagascar Malawi Mauritania Mexico Montenegro Nepal Niger North Macedonia Oman Peru Philippines Poland Romania Russian Federation Senegal Slovakia Slovenia South Africa Spain Sri Lanka Switzerland Thailand Uganda Ukraine United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania Viet Nam ZimbabweThreats
Illegal activities 572
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.