State of Conservation
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Impact of the new structure of the Maya Devi Temple (constructed in 2002) on the archaeological remains, as well as on the visual integrity. |
States Parties: | Lesotho South Africa |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Need for further research and documentation to establish an inventory of rock art in Sehlabathebe National Park; Need for study of the potential cultural contribution of other landscape elements to the cultural values of Sehlabathebe National Park |
States Parties: | Malta |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Malta |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | France |
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | France |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | France |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Mali |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Cyprus |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Turkmenistan |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Turkmenistan |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Lack of maintenance ; Industrial pollution |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Lack of maintenance ; Halt of site excavations |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Lack of maintenance ; Halt of site excavations |
States Parties
Albania Algeria Argentina Australia Belgium Benin Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Brazil Cambodia Chile China Colombia Cyprus Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt Ethiopia France Germany Greece Indonesia Iraq Ireland Italy Jordan Lao People's Democratic Republic Lesotho Libya Mali Malta Morocco Nepal Netherlands (Kingdom of the) Paraguay Peru Poland Russian Federation Slovenia South Africa Türkiye Turkmenistan United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.