State of Conservation
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2 |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Türkiye |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected areas (mainly the Ottoman period timber houses in the district of Zeyrek and Süleymaniye) |
States Parties: | Belgium |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Paraguay |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Argentina Brazil |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7A,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7Rev |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties
Albania Algeria Argentina Australia Belgium Benin Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Brazil Cambodia Chile China Colombia Cyprus Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt Ethiopia France Germany Greece Indonesia Iraq Ireland Italy Jordan Lao People's Democratic Republic Lesotho Libya Mali Malta Morocco Nepal Netherlands (Kingdom of the) Paraguay Peru Poland Russian Federation Slovenia South Africa Türkiye Turkmenistan United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.