State of Conservation
43
Reports
15
Properties concerned
12
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2016close
Region:
Africaclose
States Parties: | Niger |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Decline in wildlife populations |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Lack of cartography, documentation and equipment |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Lack of cartography, documentation and equipment |
States Parties: | Senegal |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | a) Hazardous condition of the buildingsb) Integrity of the propert |
States Parties: | Kenya |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B,WHC.03/27.COM/7B.Corr |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Lesotho South Africa |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Need for further research and documentation to establish an inventory of rock art in Sehlabathebe National Park; Need for study of the potential cultural contribution of other landscape elements to the cultural values of Sehlabathebe National Park |
States Parties: | Central African Republic |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A,WHC.03/27.COM/7A.Corr |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Kenya |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Uncontrolled forest land excisions, in the Mount Hombe and Ragat blocks |
States Parties: | Kenya |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Uncontrolled forest land excisions, in the Mount Hombe and Ragat blocks |
States Parties: | Côte d'Ivoire Guinea |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | h) Geological and architectural characteristics of the churches. |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Geological and architectural characteristics of the churches. |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Geological and architectural characteristics of the churches |
States Parties: | Benin |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Fire; Major deterioration of almost 50% of the earthen structural components |
States Parties: | Benin |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Fire; Major deterioration of almost 50% of the earthen structural components |
States Parties: | Benin |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Major deterioration of almost 50% of the earthen structural components |
States Parties: | Benin |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Major deterioration of almost 50% of the earthen structural components; |
States Parties: | Benin |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Major deterioration of nearly two-thirds of the earthen brick structures |
Danger List: | Yes |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.