State of Conservation
40
Reports
14
Properties concerned
10
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2014close
Region:
Africaclose
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Decline in wildlife populations |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Lack of cartography, documentation and equipment |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Lack of cartography, documentation and equipment |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | a) Hazardous condition of the buildingsb) Integrity of the propert |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B,WHC.03/27.COM/7B.Corr |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A,WHC.03/27.COM/7A.Corr |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Uncontrolled forest land excisions, in the Mount Hombe and Ragat blocks |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Uncontrolled forest land excisions, in the Mount Hombe and Ragat blocks |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | h) Geological and architectural characteristics of the churches. |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Geological and architectural characteristics of the churches. |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Geological and architectural characteristics of the churches |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Fire; Major deterioration of almost 50% of the earthen structural components |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Fire; Major deterioration of almost 50% of the earthen structural components |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Major deterioration of almost 50% of the earthen structural components |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Major deterioration of almost 50% of the earthen structural components; |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Major deterioration of nearly two-thirds of the earthen brick structures |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Grave degradation of nearly two thirds of the mud brick buildings |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Serious degradation of nearly 2/3 of the mud-brick constructions |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Collapsing monumentsNo participation of community |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | a) Collapsing monumentsb) No participation of communit |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | - Collapsing monuments- No participation of communit |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Collapsing monuments due to lack of maintenance |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Threats to wildlife migration and populations |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Loss of biodiversity |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Environmental pressures in relation with the Malindi port project; Natural disasters and lack of risk-preparedness |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | b) Environmental pressures in relation with the Malindi port projectc) Natural disasters and lack of risk-preparedness |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Environmental pressures |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Environmental pressure |
States Parties
Benin Central African Republic Côte d'Ivoire Ethiopia Guinea Kenya Mali Niger Senegal United Republic of TanzaniaThreats
Legal framework 40
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.