State of Conservation
75
Reports
10
Properties concerned
10
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2003close
Region:
Africaclose
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2024 |
Document Source: | WHC/24/46.COM/7B.Add.3 |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2023 |
Document Source: | WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: |
2021
Initialy proposed for examination in 2020
|
Document Source: | WHC/21/44.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2018 |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B,WHC.03/27.COM/7B.Corr |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties
Benin Burkina Faso Cameroon Ethiopia Kenya Niger Senegal United Republic of Tanzania Zambia ZimbabweThreats
Water infrastructure 75
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.