Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

9
Reports
5
Properties concerned
5
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date end:2024close
Threats* : Localised utilitiesclose
Region: Asia and the Pacificclose
Historic Centre of Bukhara (2011)
States Parties: Uzbekistan
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Localised utilities
Kathmandu Valley (2018)
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2018
Document Source: WHC/18/42.COM/7B
Threats*: Localised utilities
Kathmandu Valley (2017)
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2017
Document Source: WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add2,WHC/17/41.COM/INF.7 Rev
Threats*: Localised utilities
Ruins of the Buddhist Vihara at Paharpur (2007)
States Parties: Bangladesh
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Localised utilities
Seokguram Grotto and Bulguksa Temple (1999)
States Parties: Republic of Korea
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14
Threats*: Localised utilities
Taxila (2013)
States Parties: Pakistan
Year: 2013
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Localised utilities
Other Threats: Lack of vegetation control
Taxila (2000)
States Parties: Pakistan
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/5
Threats*: Localised utilities
Other Threats: Lack of vegetation control
Taxila (1999)
States Parties: Pakistan
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14
Threats*: Localised utilities
Other Threats: Lack of vegetation control
Taxila (1995)
States Parties: Pakistan
Year: 1995
Document Source: WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1
Threats*: Localised utilities
Other Threats: Lack of vegetation control
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Bangladesh Nepal Pakistan Republic of Korea Uzbekistan
Threats
Localised utilities 9

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top